PinMeTo has the proof: 100+ people across six offices (Malmö, Stockholm, Helsinki, Oslo, Gdańsk, Mumbai), 10+ years, 130+ countries, 100+ networks, and customers like H&M, Boots, Starbucks, 7-Eleven, Coop, AVIA, Preem, Hertz. This is not a credibility problem, it is reach and timing. What makes PinMeTo unusually easy to sell with outbound: the problem you fix is visible from the outside, for free, without permission. Listings, hours, reviews, reply rate, Apple Maps coverage, AI search answers. All public. We measure them, count them, and put the count in the first line of the email. We are not sending a pitch. We are sending evidence.
H&M. Boots. Starbucks. 7-Eleven. Coop. AVIA. Preem. Hertz. PinMeTo already runs the local presence for the top of the category across the Nordics and beyond. You do not need to convince buyers the platform works. You need to be in the room the moment a chain has a live reason to fix its local data.
A Head of Marketing at a 200-store chain will never reply to “buy our local marketing platform.” They reply when someone shows them 37 of their locations have wrong hours on Google, or their reply rate is 6% while a competitor’s is 48%. Their own number, verifiable in thirty seconds.
Every listing, hour, review, reply rate, Apple Maps coverage, ChatGPT answer for a brand is public. We measure them, quote them, hand over a scorecard before we ask for anything. Coverage gaps sell Listings. Reply rate sells Reviews and Conversations. AI answers sell Local Pages and GEO. Wrong hours sell the entire platform.
PinMeTo is not a hard sell once the marketing director sees their scorecard. ISO 27001, GDPR compliant, EU data residency. The wedge against US incumbents. Modular pricing per location. In-house support. And the AI search story is a live category conversation right now, with PinMeTo already positioned for it.
~4,500–6,500 chains across Nordics + DACH + UK
~600–900 enterprise chains across the same geo
info@ addresses. Every message goes to the actual marketing decision-maker in their language, with a scorecard number from their own brand.| Signal | Source | Temp | Why it matters for PinMeTo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feed 1 · Bad + unanswered reviews (clusters of 1-star reviews about wrong hours / closed-when-open / wrong address, and 90-day reply rate) | Google, Trustpilot, Facebook, app store scrapes | High-intent | Single most felt pain in the category. A regional manager reads “11 of your stores have 1-star reviews saying hours are wrong” and does not need selling. Reply-rate is one figure they can verify in 30s. |
| Feed 2 · AI search invisibility (real customer queries tested across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews) | Fixed query set per brand + local geo-grid map pack rank | Highest | PinMeTo’s own headline positioning. A screenshot of ChatGPT giving a customer the wrong hours for their named store is not a pitch, it’s a problem they have to fix. Board is already asking “what’s our AI plan.” |
| Feed 3 · Timing triggers (new store openings, rebrands, M&A, closures, franchise expansion, new marketing leadership, agency-of-record change) | Trade press, planning apps, Crunchbase, LinkedIn hire tracking, careers pages | Timing | Dated events that force a brand to touch every listing they own. Rebrand is the strongest trigger in the category. Every listing on every platform to a public deadline. |
| Feed 4 · Hiring & job posts that describe the PinMeTo job (first-of-role local marketing hires, body-text search for “GBP,” “listings,” “local SEO,” job ads naming a competitor) | LinkedIn, TheirStack, careers pages, ATS scrapes | Highest | Pain written down, by them, in public, in their own words. When a job spec says “you will own our Google Business Profiles across 180 stores,” there is nothing left to persuade. |
| Feed 5 · Listing & data decay (coverage gaps, Apple Maps weakness, unclaimed profiles, data drift, wrong hours, ghost listings, unanswered Q&A, stale photos) | Google Business Profile API, Apple Maps scrape, Bing, Meta, own store-locator crawl | High-intent | The measurement layer under everything else. Also what makes the Local Presence Scorecard possible. |
| Competitor displacement | Store locator fingerprinting, “powered by” footers, G2 / Capterra reviews of Yext, Uberall, Partoo, SOCi, Birdeye, Reputation.com | Switch | Named poach list of brands already paying for the category, no budget education needed. Wedge choice per competitor: EU data residency vs modular pricing vs AI story. |
| Website de-anonymisation | RB2B / Vector / Koala pixel on pinmeto.com (esp. pricing page) | High-intent | Real companies with real domains browsing your pricing. Capture demand already generated. |
| LinkedIn engagement mining | Engagement on PinMeTo posts, competitor pages, local SEO / GEO content | High-fit | Active professional audience exists in this category (unlike many industries). |
| Speed-to-lead on demo requests | Your CRM / site forms | Highest | You already pay to generate this demand. Contact within minutes. |
| CRM reactivation of closed-lost + churned | Your CRM: stalled opps, churned accounts | High-fit | “Too small at 30 locations” three years ago may be 90 now. Reason for old no has expired. |
Right brand, real scorecard finding. Handed over with the brand name, the one alarming number, the vertical case study to reference, and the exact opener, ready for the marketing director’s inbox.
Right brand, no live trigger yet. Kept warm with useful touches until a review cluster, a rebrand, a hire or an AI-answer failure moves them to A.
Single-location businesses, chains below your minimum band, existing customers, live opportunities, brands using PinMeTo already. Filtered out automatically before enrichment.
You already have GroupM as a customer and a dedicated product page for agencies. What is missing is a systematic way to source more of them. Agencies managing local presence for a client across hundreds of locations are either doing it by hand, reselling a competitor’s tool on thin margin, or losing pitches to agencies that have a platform. PinMeTo gives them a platform + API + a reason to win the local retainer instead of subcontracting it.
Comes first because it needs no list building.
Pull the exhibitor and attendee lists. Find the marketing, digital and local decision-makers. Build the target list against your ICP and vertical priority.
Aim at booked meetings, not awareness. Two weeks before, confirm slots and hand your team a schedule.
Chase no-shows and walk-ups live. After the show, follow up everyone on the list whether they met you or not. The list rolls into the evergreen engine.
Two clean options instead of a five-tier ladder. Evergreen (€5,500) for always-on reach across every multi-location brand in the target markets, plus the agency channel. Signal Outreach (€7,500) for all five signal feeds and the Local Presence Scorecard. Run both together for €10,000 and save €3,000 versus buying them separately, and a warm caller is bundled in at no extra cost. They work better together anyway: the evergreen base makes the signal outreach warm, and the warm caller qualifies every engaged lead before it hits your BD team’s calendar.
Full pre-show, on-show and post-show campaign per event. Not always-on. Billed only when you exhibit or attend.
Two things make the maths unusually good here. First, PinMeTo sells a subscription, not a project. A brand won this year is still paying next year. Programme is measured against the lifetime of the accounts it brings in, not one month of revenue.
Second, pricing is per location. A chain that lands at 80 locations and grows to 200 grows the contract without another sale. Accounts get more valuable on their own.
A year of the full programme (€10k × 12 = €120k) is covered by a single signed chain of reasonable size. Everything after is margin.
Give us your average ACV by tier and demo-to-close win rate, and this stops being “a single signed chain” and becomes a real number.